By Nurse Practitioners States With The Least Restrictive Regulations Experienced The Largest Increase In
نویسندگان
چکیده
The use of nurse practitioners (NPs) is one way to address the shortage of physician primary care providers. NP training programs and the number of practicing NPs have increased in the past two decades. However, regulations limiting their scope of practice vary greatly by state. We assessed the impact of state regulations on the increase in care provided by NPs in the United States, using a 5 percent national sample of Medicare beneficiaries. We found that between 1998 and 2010 the number of Medicare patients receiving care from NPs increased fifteenfold. By 2010 states with the least restrictive regulations of NP practice had a 2.5-fold greater likelihood of patients’ receiving their primary care from NPs than did the most restrictive states. Relaxing state restrictions on NP practice should increase the use of NPs as primary care providers, which in turn would reduce the current national shortage of primary care providers. I ncreasing access to primary care is a key focus of health reform in the United States. Primary care helps patients in decision making, provides opportunities for disease prevention and health promotion, and can engage patients’ family and community to help meet the health needs of the patients. States with a higher ratio of primary care physicians to patients have lower Medicare expenditures and lower total and disease-specificmortality.However, since 1998 the proportion of US medical students choosing careers in primary care has dropped from around 60 percent to 20–27 percent. One way to address the shortage of physician primary care providers is with nurse practitioners (NPs). The past two decades have witnessed an increase in NP training programs and the number of practicing NPs. However, states vary greatly in regulating the scope ofNPs’ practice and in the precision and detail of those regulations. In some states NPs have essentially the same authority to practice that physicians have. Other states require physician supervision and limit NPs’ hospital privileges as well as their authority to order tests, make referrals, and prescribe medications. The online Appendix contains (in Exhibits 1a and 2a) a summary of regulations for each state and how they have changed over time. These restrictions may inhibit the spread of care provided by NPs. Previous studies have found an increase over time in both the number of nurse practitioners and the number of patients receiving care from them. These studies were based on national health care surveys and included small numbers ofNPs. In this articleweassess thegrowth in care provided by nurse practitioners from 1998 through 2010 and how this varies by practice setting, using national Medicare data as well as the number of licensed NPs as reported by state authorities.We were particularly interested in the variation among states in NPs serving as primary care providers. We hypothesized that states with fewer restrictions on NP practice and areas with a lower supply of primary care doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0072
منابع مشابه
The Extraregulatory Effect of Nurse Practitioner Scope-of-Practice Laws on Physician Malpractice Rates.
Patients can hold physicians directly or vicariously liable for the malpractice of nurse practitioners under their supervision. Restrictive scope-of-practice laws governing nurse practitioners can ease patients' legal burdens in establishing physician liability. We analyze the effect of restrictive scope-of-practice laws on the number of malpractice payments made on behalf of physicians between...
متن کاملNurse overtime, working conditions, and the presence of mandatory nurse overtime regulations.
Although more states have regulated mandatory nurse overtime, limited research has examined the impact of these regulations on the actual time nurses work and their working conditions. The purpose of this study was to compare nurse overtime and working conditions between states with and states without regulations limiting mandatory nurse overtime. Data were collected from registered nurses work...
متن کاملRadically Questioning the Principle of the Least Restrictive Alternative: A Reply to Nir Eyal; Comment on “Nudging by Shaming, Shaming by Nudging”
In his insightful editorial, Nir Eyal explores the connections between nudging and shaming. One upshot of his argument is that we should question the principle of the least restrictive alternative in public health and health policy. In this commentary, I maintain that Eyal’s argument undermines only a rather implausible version of the principle of the least restrictive alternative and I sketch ...
متن کاملMonitoring and investigating certified registered nurse practitioners in pain management.
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 31 (2003): 101–118. © 2003 by the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics. he Mayday Scholars Program for 2001–2002 provided an opportunity to boards of nursing to present their experiences in monitoring the prescribing practices of advanced practice nurses and to research ways for improving their own investigation processes as professional disciplinary age...
متن کاملMaximizing the nurses’ preferences in nurse scheduling problem: mathematical modeling and a meta-heuristic algorithm
The nurse scheduling problem (NSP) has received a great amount of attention in recent years. In the NSP, the goal is to assign shifts to the nurses in order to satisfy the hospital’s demand during the planning horizon by considering different objective functions. In this research, we focus on maximizing the nurses’ preferences for working shifts and weekends off by considering several important...
متن کامل